The fast-changing world of faculty athletics is about to collide with the ever-changing doctrine of joint employment.
In January 2022, on behalf of soccer and basketball athletes on the College of Southern California (USC), the Nationwide School Gamers Affiliation (NCPA) filed an unfair labor observe cost with the Nationwide Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in opposition to USC, the Pac-12, and the NCAA. Within the cost, the NCPA argued that faculty athletes needs to be thought-about staff and never student-athletes. On December 15, 2022, the NLRB’s Los Angeles Area agreed. NLRB Basic Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo stated in a press release that USC, the Pac-12, and the NCAA have collectively “maintained illegal guidelines and unlawfully misclassified scholarship basketball and soccer gamers as mere ‘student-athletes’ somewhat than staff entitled to safety below our legislation.” In September 2021, Abruzzo issued a memo (GC 21-08) making clear that some faculty athletes needs to be thought-about staff.
Thus, whereas the Basic Counsel’s stance on student-athletes just isn’t altogether stunning, that is the primary time the Basic Counsel has formally argued that not solely is USC an employer, but in addition, the Pac-12 and the NCAA needs to be thought-about “joint employers.” This discovering, if it stands, signifies that different athletes in different NCAA Division I Soccer Bowl Subdivision colleges may argue they’re additionally staff with the correct to discount immediately with a convention. Moreover, whereas many publicly funded colleges are probably exempt from protection below the Nationwide Labor Relations Act (NLRA), the affiliated convention could also be topic to the NLRA. If the NLRB finds a joint-employment relationship exists, these conferences may very well be pressured to discount. It additionally opens the door to potential unions that might include athletes from multiple college.
This high-profile case, due to this fact, has the potential to alter long-standing NLRB precedent on joint-employment (which is already a hotly contested situation earlier than the NLRB), student-athletes, and NLRA jurisdiction that might have an effect on employment practices at each faculty establishment — with each faculty sports activities fan watching.
The NCPA’s Govt Director, Ramogi Huma, expressed his satisfaction with the NLRB’s Los Angeles Area’s ruling, saying, “Gaining worker standing and the correct to arrange is a crucial half in ending NCAA sports activities enterprise practices that illegally exploit faculty athletes’ labor ….” Nonetheless, the NCAA continues to carry agency that “faculty athletes aren’t staff of the NCAA, no matter sport or division” and “the NCAA’s dedication is to student-athletes, and it’ll proceed to vigorously defend any makes an attempt to divide them primarily based on arbitrary requirements, because it demeans the onerous work and sacrifice of all who take part in faculty sports activities.” USC issued an analogous assertion, vowing to current “all of the related information … together with 75 years of favorable authorized precedent” on the acceptable time.
The subsequent step is settlement or a listening to with an administrative legislation decide. The latter is the extra probably path, adopted by important appellate litigation.
Whereas there are nonetheless a number of hurdles forward for faculty athletes and establishments, these urgent labor legislation points current a major problem to the incoming-NCAA President Charlie Baker, who will take over from Mark Emmert as of March 1, 2023, in addition to all collegiate establishments.
Please contact a Jackson Lewis lawyer with any questions.